BSCW vs. VUSV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. BSCW is passively managed, while VUSV is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BSCW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.

Performance

BSCW vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VUSV's 12.00% return.

BSCW

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: -0.69%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 1Y: 2.29%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.17%

VUSV

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: 8.16%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	$7.39M	$5.81M	$6.89M
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	$776.50K	$906.43K	$757.88K

BSCW vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.37%	1.06%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	12.00%	5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCW and VUSV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

BSCW vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSCW

BSCW Risk / Return Rank: 32
BSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

VUSV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSCW vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSCW	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.04	—	—

Drawdowns

BSCW vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and VUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCW	VUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-7.06%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	0.00%	-1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-1.18%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSCW	VUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83%	11.69%	-7.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	11.69%	-4.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.13%	11.69%	-4.56%

BSCW vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCW vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison

BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	4.87%	4.81%	5.06%	4.80%	1.12%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCW and VUSV in my portfolio?

BSCW and VUSV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSCW or VUSV?

On fees, BSCW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCW or VUSV?

BSCW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VUSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCW or VUSV?

BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between BSCW and VUSV?

BSCW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCW and 0.30% for VUSV.