BSCW vs. IBDS
BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and IBDS (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCW tracks the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index while IBDS tracks the Bloomberg Barclays December 2027 Maturity Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCW returned 5.57%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for IBDS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
BSCW vs. IBDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than IBDS's 1.23% return.
BSCW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCW vs. IBDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.16% | 9.00% | 2.20% | 9.31% | 0.31% |
IBDS iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF | 1.23% | 5.86% | 4.61% | 6.44% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCW and IBDS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BSCW and IBDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCW vs. IBDS — Risk / Return Rank
BSCW
IBDS
BSCW vs. IBDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCW | IBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 2.09 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 10.55 | -8.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 48.73 | -41.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCW | IBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 4.19 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.57 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BSCW vs. IBDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum IBDS drawdown of -16.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and IBDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCW | IBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -16.75% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -0.43% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.24% | -2.27% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.06% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -3.36% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.09% | +0.77% |
Volatility
BSCW vs. IBDS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS) at 0.15%. This indicates that BSCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCW | IBDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 0.15% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 0.64% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 1.10% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 4.18% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 5.55% | +1.69% |
BSCW vs. IBDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSCW and IBDS have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCW vs. IBDS - Dividend Comparison
BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than IBDS's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.83% | 4.81% | 5.06% | 4.80% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDS iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF | 4.32% | 4.36% | 4.37% | 3.81% | 2.87% | 2.19% | 2.66% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCW and IBDS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCW has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to IBDS (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCW dropped -8.32% vs IBDS's -16.75%.
On 3-year performance, BSCW leads with 5.57% vs 5.28% for IBDS. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBDS has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSCW has performed better with a 5.57% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCW and IBDS have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 4.32% for IBDS.
BSCW tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while IBDS tracks Bloomberg Barclays December 2027 Maturity Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
IBDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCW and IBDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer