PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCV vs. BSCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCV vs. BSCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCV achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than BSCS's 0.76% return.


BSCV

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
10Y*

BSCS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCV vs. BSCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSCV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF
0.13%9.04%2.62%9.16%-16.90%-1.62%
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
0.76%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCV and BSCS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021

0.92

The correlation between BSCV and BSCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSCV vs. BSCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCV
BSCS

Technology

13.8%
11.9%

Healthcare

13.1%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.4%

Financial Services

9.2%
14.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.1%

Energy

7.3%
3.6%

Industrials

6.4%
8.4%

Real Estate

5.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.8%

Utilities

3.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.4%

Technology

BSCV
13.8%
BSCS
11.9%

Healthcare

BSCV
13.1%
BSCS
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCV
9.4%
BSCS
9.4%

Financial Services

BSCV
9.2%
BSCS
14.8%

Communication Services

BSCV
8.6%
BSCS
4.1%

Energy

BSCV
7.3%
BSCS
3.6%

Industrials

BSCV
6.4%
BSCS
8.4%

Real Estate

BSCV
5.2%
BSCS
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSCV
4.4%
BSCS
5.8%

Utilities

BSCV
3.8%
BSCS
4.5%

Basic Materials

BSCV
1.2%
BSCS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCV vs. BSCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCV
BSCV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCV vs. BSCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCVBSCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.58

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

4.29

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

18.35

-11.17

BSCV vs. BSCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BSCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCV and BSCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCVBSCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.75

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.60

-0.60

Drawdowns

BSCV vs. BSCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than BSCS's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and BSCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCVBSCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-18.40%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-1.08%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.75%

-3.14%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.10%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-4.20%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.25%

+0.49%

Volatility

BSCV vs. BSCS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) at 0.37%. This indicates that BSCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCVBSCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.37%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

1.01%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

1.68%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.36%

4.92%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

6.24%

+1.12%

BSCV vs. BSCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSCV and BSCS have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCV vs. BSCS - Dividend Comparison

BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than BSCS's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%
BSCV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF
4.69%4.65%4.87%4.47%3.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCV and BSCS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCV has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BSCS (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCV dropped -23.28% vs BSCS's -18.40%.

On 3-year performance, BSCV leads with 5.70% vs 5.45% for BSCS. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCS has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSCV has performed better with a 5.70% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCV and BSCS have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

BSCV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.46% for BSCS.

BSCV tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index.

BSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCV and BSCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer