PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCV vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCV vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCV achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.65% return.


BSCV

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCV vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSCV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF
-0.09%9.04%2.62%9.16%-16.90%-1.46%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.65%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCV and SGOV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.02

The correlation between BSCV and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCV vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCV
BSCV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCV vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCVSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-272.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

195.05

-193.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

397.15

-395.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

4,450.28

-4,444.26

BSCV vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCV and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCV vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCVSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-0.03%

-23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-0.01%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.75%

-0.01%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

0.00%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-0.00%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.00%

+0.78%

Volatility

BSCV vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that BSCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCVSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.05%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

0.13%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

0.19%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.34%

0.24%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.34%

0.24%

+7.10%

BSCV vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCV vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BSCV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF
4.70%4.65%4.87%4.47%3.43%0.57%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCV and SGOV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCV has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCV dropped -23.28% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 3-year performance, BSCV leads with 5.70% vs 4.70% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSCV has performed better with a 5.70% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCV.

BSCV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

BSCV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. BSCV tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCV and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.44 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCV and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer