PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return.


BSCS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.03%
6M
0.79%
YTD
1.16%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.70%

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.44M$10.96M$10.54M
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

BSCS vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
1.16%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.89%10.17%15.41%-0.30%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-30.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCS and USO is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BSCS and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSCS vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCSUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.25

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.93

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

5.60

+10.60

BSCS vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCS and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-98.19%

+79.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-32.49%

+31.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-32.49%

+29.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-36.23%

+18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-86.26%

+86.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-75.38%

+71.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

12.03%

-11.78%

Volatility

BSCS vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is 0.46%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that BSCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

17.73%

-17.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

42.79%

-41.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60%

46.91%

-45.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

37.06%

-32.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.18%

39.29%

-33.11%

BSCS vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCS vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCS and USO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to BSCS (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 20.59% vs 1.07% for BSCS. On fees, BSCS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCS has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

BSCS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USO is Oil & Gas. BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.86% for USO.

BSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer