PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCS achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 2.01% return.


BSCS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.08%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*

FLOT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.15%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCS vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
0.83%7.04%3.87%7.62%-11.24%-1.89%10.17%15.41%-0.30%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.01%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCS and FLOT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCS vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCSFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

3.11

-1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

11.03

-7.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.59

102.10

-85.51

BSCS vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCS and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-13.54%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-0.43%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

-1.57%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-2.36%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.02%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-0.21%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.05%

+0.20%

Volatility

BSCS vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that BSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

0.21%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

0.63%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63%

0.75%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

1.78%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

4.15%

+2.07%

BSCS vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCS vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than FLOT's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCS and FLOT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCS has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCS dropped -18.40% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 5-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.22% vs 1.28% for BSCS. On fees, BSCS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.22% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.46% for BSCS.

BSCS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. BSCS tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 TR Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.36 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer