BSCQ vs. IBTG
BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCQ returned 1.47%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for IBTG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSCQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTG.
Performance
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than IBTG's 1.44% return.
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 6.30% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 1.44% | 4.40% | 3.97% | 4.34% | -8.18% | -3.04% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCQ and IBTG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BSCQ and IBTG has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. IBTG — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
IBTG
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.45 | 4.40 | -0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.24 | 63.59 | -20.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 179.65 | 256.63 | -76.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06 | 8.02 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.26 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.29 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than IBTG's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and IBTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -13.62% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.07% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.13% | -1.33% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -12.31% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -4.90% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) has a higher volatility of 0.17% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) at 0.12%. This indicates that BSCQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 0.12% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.32% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.52% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 3.27% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 3.45% | +1.32% |
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than IBTG's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 3.96% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCQ and IBTG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCQ has higher volatility (0.17%) compared to IBTG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCQ dropped -16.50% vs IBTG's -13.62%.
On 5-year performance, BSCQ leads with 1.47% vs 0.84% for IBTG. On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 3.96% for IBTG.
BSCQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBTG is Government Bonds. BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while IBTG tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCQ and 0.07% for IBTG.
IBTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 7.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCQ and IBTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer