BSCQ vs. IBTG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG).
BSCQ and IBTG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. Both BSCQ and IBTG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 6.30% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 0.82% | 4.40% | 3.97% | 4.34% | -8.18% | -3.04% | 3.99% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSCQ having a 0.79% return and IBTG slightly higher at 0.82%.
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. IBTG — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
IBTG
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.39 | 6.12 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.14 | 11.94 | -2.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.82 | 2.98 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.98 | 17.55 | -6.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.48 | 84.44 | -10.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39 | 6.12 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.26 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCQ and IBTG is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than IBTG's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.01% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than IBTG's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and IBTG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -13.62% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | -0.23% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -12.31% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -5.04% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.05% | +0.01% |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. IBTG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) has a higher volatility of 0.22% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) at 0.12%. This indicates that BSCQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 0.12% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.45% | 0.34% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 0.66% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 3.29% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 3.50% | +1.31% |