PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -6.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRZU having a -16.20% annualized return and TMF not far behind at -16.56%.


BRZU

1D
-6.46%
1M
-22.26%
YTD
11.76%
6M
2.36%
1Y
55.66%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
-16.20%

TMF

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.22%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
-20.78%
5Y*
-30.52%
10Y*
-16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
11.76%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X
-6.13%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%22.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and TMF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

-0.05

The correlation between BRZU and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRZU vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRZU
TMF

Financial Services

32.7%
18.7%

Energy

18.7%

-

Basic Materials

13.7%

-

Utilities

12.8%

-

Industrials

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%

-

Technology

0.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

BRZU
32.7%
TMF
18.7%

Energy

BRZU
18.7%
TMF

-

Basic Materials

BRZU
13.7%
TMF

-

Utilities

BRZU
12.8%
TMF

-

Industrials

BRZU
10.9%
TMF

-

Consumer Defensive

BRZU
4.2%
TMF

-

Healthcare

BRZU
2.4%
TMF

-

Communication Services

BRZU
2.2%
TMF

-

Consumer Cyclical

BRZU
1.5%
TMF

-

Technology

BRZU
0.9%
TMF

-

Real Estate

BRZU

-

TMF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRZUTMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

0.03

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

0.25

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.03

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.03

+1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

0.08

+5.16

BRZU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRZUTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.03

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.66

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

-0.38

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.14

-0.22

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-92.89%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.39%

-26.51%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-56.31%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.00%

-88.81%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

-92.89%

-5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.20%

-92.23%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.55%

-43.63%

-45.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.66%

11.49%

-0.83%

Volatility

BRZU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 15.75% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.09%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.75%

8.09%

+7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.66%

19.01%

+22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.58%

28.76%

+20.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.40%

46.75%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.15%

43.92%

+39.23%

BRZU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than TMF's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.39%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X
4.15%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and TMF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to TMF (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 10-year performance, BRZU leads with -16.20% vs -16.56% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BRZU has performed better with a -16.20% return vs -16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMF is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 2.39% for BRZU.

BRZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 1.09% for TMF.

BRZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer