PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BRZU has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -16.81%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


BRZU

1D
-1.27%
1M
-11.33%
YTD
9.75%
6M
11.32%
1Y
46.87%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
-5.19%
10Y*
-16.81%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
9.75%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and SCHG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.39

The correlation between BRZU and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRZU vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRZU
SCHG

Financial Services

33.4%
6.6%

Energy

16.7%
0.7%

Basic Materials

15.3%
1.3%

Utilities

12.8%
0.4%

Industrials

11.0%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.6%

Healthcare

2.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

2.1%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
12.4%

Technology

0.4%
46.7%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Financial Services

BRZU
33.4%
SCHG
6.6%

Energy

BRZU
16.7%
SCHG
0.7%

Basic Materials

BRZU
15.3%
SCHG
1.3%

Utilities

BRZU
12.8%
SCHG
0.4%

Industrials

BRZU
11.0%
SCHG
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

BRZU
4.6%
SCHG
1.6%

Healthcare

BRZU
2.3%
SCHG
8.4%

Communication Services

BRZU
2.1%
SCHG
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BRZU
1.4%
SCHG
12.4%

Technology

BRZU
0.4%
SCHG
46.7%

Real Estate

BRZU

-

SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRZUSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.10

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

3.58

+0.01

BRZU vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-34.59%

-65.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.97%

-16.41%

-19.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-23.39%

-34.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.60%

-34.59%

-29.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

-34.59%

-63.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.21%

-6.46%

-92.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.56%

-5.20%

-84.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.08%

5.02%

+8.06%

Volatility

BRZU vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

5.91%

+6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.48%

12.52%

+26.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.99%

16.24%

+33.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.49%

22.38%

+33.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.70%

21.58%

+61.12%

BRZU vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.43%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and SCHG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs -16.81% for BRZU. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs -16.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

BRZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer