BRZU vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BRZU (Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BRZU tracks the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BRZU returned 53.22% vs 21.24% for FNGU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRZU charges 1.29%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

BRZU vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 3.96% return.

BRZU

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 53.22%
• 3Y*: 6.31%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: -15.10%

FNGU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: -3.67%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares	14.47%	49.53%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	3.96%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and FNGU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.38

BRZU vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRZU	FNGU
Financial Services	32.7%	-
Energy	18.7%	-
Basic Materials	13.7%	-
Utilities	12.8%	-
Industrials	10.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	-
Healthcare	2.4%	-
Communication Services	2.2%	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	9.6%
Technology	0.9%	60.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BRZU vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU

BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 34
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRZU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.35	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	0.87	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.11	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	0.36	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	0.85	+3.57

BRZU vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRZU	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.71%	-61.30%	-38.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.97%	-59.55%	+23.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.18%	-27.36%	-71.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.55%	-22.25%	-67.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.06%	24.91%	-12.85%

Volatility

BRZU vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) is 14.76%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that BRZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRZU	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.76%	27.31%	-12.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.95%	50.15%	-10.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.10%	61.43%	-11.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.45%	79.93%	-24.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.91%	79.93%	+2.98%

BRZU vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRZU vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares	2.33%	2.39%	8.73%	3.24%	4.70%	6.29%	0.78%	0.95%	1.04%	0.74%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRZU and FNGU in my portfolio?

BRZU and FNGU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRZU or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to BRZU (14.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, BRZU or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, BRZU leads with 53.22% vs 21.24% for FNGU. On fees, BRZU is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, BRZU has been the lower-risk option at 14.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRZU or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, BRZU has performed better with a 53.22% return vs 21.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRZU or FNGU?

BRZU is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRZU or FNGU?

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between BRZU and FNGU?

BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.