BRW vs. ACP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) and ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BRW returned 6.18%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRW charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for ACP.

Performance

BRW vs. ACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than ACP's 3.36% return.

BRW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: -4.10%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: —

ACP

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 3.36%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: 8.07%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRW vs. ACP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund	-0.25%	5.89%	12.16%	18.49%	-4.64%	3.19%
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	3.36%	6.48%	4.81%	19.27%	-22.87%	-12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BRW and ACP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021	0.24

Return for Risk

BRW vs. ACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRW

BRW Risk / Return Rank: 2
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ACP

ACP Risk / Return Rank: 6
ACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRW vs. ACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRW	ACP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	0.47	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	0.73	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.09	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	0.52	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	1.46	-1.86

BRW vs. ACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ACP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRW and ACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRW vs. ACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum ACP drawdown of -51.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and ACP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRW	ACP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.74%	-51.03%	+33.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.74%	-10.51%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.74%	-18.97%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	-38.83%	+21.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.10%	-7.24%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-11.10%	+7.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.16%	3.72%	+6.44%

Volatility

BRW vs. ACP - Volatility Comparison

Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) at 3.76%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRW	ACP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.76%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	9.56%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.33%	11.64%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.93%	16.97%	-4.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.89%	21.09%	-8.20%

BRW vs. ACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRW has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than ACP's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRW vs. ACP - Dividend Comparison

BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, less than ACP's 18.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	18.13%	17.19%	19.72%	17.65%	17.70%	11.76%	12.73%	12.27%	12.60%	10.26%	10.72%	12.69%
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund	15.71%	14.46%	12.27%	16.02%	13.82%	4.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRW and ACP in my portfolio?

BRW and ACP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRW or ACP?

BRW has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to ACP (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs ACP's -51.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.