ACP vs. AWP
ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) and AWP (abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund) are both mutual funds - ACP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while AWP is a REIT fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACP returned 5.37%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for AWP. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACP charges 1.97%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AWP.
Performance
ACP vs. AWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACP achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than AWP's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ACP has underperformed AWP with an annualized return of 5.37%, while AWP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.31% annualized return.
ACP
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- -0.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.72%
AWP
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.09M | $2.75M | $2.45M | |
| $2.23M | $2.76M | $1.82M |
ACP vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 2.65% | 6.48% | 4.81% | 19.27% | -22.87% | 6.65% | 7.51% | 26.93% | -17.64% | 15.60% |
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 11.53% | 12.43% | 12.23% | 12.58% | -37.13% | 40.41% | -10.29% | 42.52% | -18.47% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACP and AWP is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ACP and AWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACP vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank
ACP
AWP
ACP vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACP | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.25 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 4.94 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACP vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACP drawdown since its inception was -51.03%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACP and AWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACP | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.03% | -85.93% | +34.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -14.14% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -23.09% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.83% | -43.93% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -53.95% | +2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -2.44% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -27.17% | +16.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 3.58% | +0.28% |
Volatility
ACP vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) at 3.25%. This indicates that ACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACP | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 3.25% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 11.63% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 14.13% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 21.96% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 23.53% | -2.44% |
ACP vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACP has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACP vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison
ACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.53%, more than AWP's 12.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 18.53% | 17.19% | 19.72% | 17.65% | 17.70% | 11.76% | 12.73% | 12.27% | 12.60% | 10.26% | 10.72% | 12.69% |
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 12.03% | 12.50% | 12.44% | 12.37% | 12.31% | 7.02% | 9.13% | 8.49% | 12.05% | 8.90% | 11.70% | 10.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACP and AWP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACP has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to AWP (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACP dropped -51.03% vs AWP's -85.93%.
AWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACP and AWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer