ACP vs. PCF
ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) and PCF (High Income Securities Fund) are both mutual funds - ACP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while PCF is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACP returned 5.79%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for PCF. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACP vs. PCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACP achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than PCF's -6.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACP having a 5.79% annualized return and PCF not far behind at 5.66%.
ACP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
PCF
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
ACP vs. PCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 4.98% | 6.48% | 4.81% | 19.27% | -22.87% | 6.65% | 7.51% | 26.93% | -17.64% | 15.60% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -6.20% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACP and PCF is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACP vs. PCF — Risk / Return Rank
ACP
PCF
ACP vs. PCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) and High Income Securities Fund (PCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | -0.43 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | -0.98 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACP vs. PCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACP drawdown since its inception was -51.03%, smaller than the maximum PCF drawdown of -53.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACP and PCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.03% | -53.82% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -10.73% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -13.74% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.83% | -29.06% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -45.13% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -8.09% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -10.49% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 4.71% | -0.93% |
Volatility
ACP vs. PCF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) is 3.69%, while High Income Securities Fund (PCF) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that ACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACP | PCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 4.56% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 10.29% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 11.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 16.09% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 17.54% | +3.53% |
Dividends
ACP vs. PCF - Dividend Comparison
ACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.85%, more than PCF's 12.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 17.85% | 17.19% | 19.72% | 17.65% | 17.70% | 11.76% | 12.73% | 12.27% | 12.60% | 10.26% | 10.72% | 12.69% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 12.96% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACP and PCF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCF has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to ACP (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACP dropped -51.03% vs PCF's -53.82%.
ACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACP and PCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer