PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUFX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bruce Fund (BRUFX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUFX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRUFX having a 7.47% annualized return and TPDAX not far behind at 7.18%.


BRUFX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.40%
YTD
10.15%
6M
9.88%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
7.47%

TPDAX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.99%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
10.15%14.89%4.45%-0.74%-8.80%17.35%12.06%22.42%-3.99%12.48%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.96%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUFX and TPDAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.61

The correlation between BRUFX and TPDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUFX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUFX
BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bruce Fund (BRUFX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRUFXTPDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.34

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

11.51

+2.19

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUFX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRUFXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.28

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.73

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.60

+0.07

Drawdowns

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUFX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUFX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUFXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.50%

-22.29%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-7.58%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.66%

-7.58%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-17.58%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.44%

-22.29%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-3.53%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-4.92%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.20%

-0.48%

Volatility

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

Bruce Fund (BRUFX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) at 2.91%. This indicates that BRUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUFXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.91%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

9.47%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

11.17%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.50%

10.18%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.59%

9.90%

+1.69%

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUFX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

BRUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than TPDAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
5.77%6.35%5.01%6.46%13.31%9.25%5.83%2.03%2.49%4.11%6.26%4.63%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.72%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUFX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRUFX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TPDAX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUFX dropped -44.50% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUFX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer