BRNY vs. QVMM

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

BRNY (Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) and QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both Multi-factor funds. BRNY is actively managed, while QVMM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BRNY returned 26.89%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for QVMM. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BRNY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMM.

Performance

BRNY vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BRNY having a 17.70% return and QVMM slightly higher at 18.05%.

BRNY

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 17.29%
• YTD: 17.70%
• 1Y: 30.27%
• 3Y*: 26.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.58%

QVMM

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 11.18%
• YTD: 18.05%
• 1Y: 25.49%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 8.93%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	$1.02M	$933.73K	$1.33M
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	$33.02K	$32.31K	$37.21K

BRNY vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	17.70%	22.02%	28.84%	22.36%	5.16%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	18.05%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BRNY and QVMM is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.85

The correlation between BRNY and QVMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BRNY vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRNY

BRNY Risk / Return Rank: 77
BRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 68
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRNY vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRNY	QVMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.66	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.44	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.29	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.08	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.14	11.03	+1.11

BRNY vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRNY and QVMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRNY vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRNY drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum QVMM drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNY and QVMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRNY	QVMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-24.00%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-8.30%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-24.00%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-6.88%	+4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.32%	+0.18%

Volatility

BRNY vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) at 3.82%. This indicates that BRNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRNY	QVMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	3.82%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	11.66%	+0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	15.46%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	19.36%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	19.32%	-2.12%

BRNY vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRNY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRNY vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

BRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than QVMM's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	0.20%	0.30%	0.23%	0.68%	0.22%	0.00%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.13%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRNY and QVMM in my portfolio?

BRNY and QVMM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRNY or QVMM?

BRNY has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to QVMM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRNY dropped -19.14% vs QVMM's -24.00%.

Which ETF is better, BRNY or QVMM?

On 3-year performance, BRNY leads with 26.89% vs 15.06% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRNY or QVMM?

Over the 3-year period, BRNY has performed better with a 26.89% return vs 15.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRNY or QVMM?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BRNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRNY or QVMM?

QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.20% for BRNY.

What is the main difference between BRNY and QVMM?

They also come from different issuers: Burney and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BRNY and 0.15% for QVMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.