PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRNY vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRNY vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRNY vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
-2.29%22.02%28.84%22.36%8.91%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
-3.16%20.00%30.29%36.25%7.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRNY achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's -3.16% return.


BRNY

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
1.74%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
10Y*

DYNF

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRNY vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRNY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRNY vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRNY
BRNY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRNY vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRNYDYNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.73

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.90

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.13

8.99

-0.86

BRNY vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRNY and DYNF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRNYDYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.73

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between BRNY and DYNF is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BRNY vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

BRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than DYNF's 1.02% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.38%0.30%0.23%0.68%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
1.02%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%

Drawdowns

BRNY vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRNY drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNY and DYNF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRNYDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-34.72%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.45%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-4.94%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-6.11%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.42%

+0.51%

Volatility

BRNY vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) have volatilities of 5.55% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRNYDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.59%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

10.02%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

18.21%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.49%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

20.05%

-2.99%