BRKW vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. BRKW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

BRKW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BRKW

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: -3.91%
• 6M: -3.53%
• 1Y: -2.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 32.39%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	2.76%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	159.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and DRAM is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	-0.25

BRKW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRKW	DRAM
Financial Services	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BRKW vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 7
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKW	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	—	—

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKW	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-19.97%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.97%	-13.37%	+6.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-3.27%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRKW	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.21%	92.40%	-75.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	92.40%	-75.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	92.40%	-75.26%

BRKW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.43%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.43%	14.45%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKW and DRAM in my portfolio?

BRKW and DRAM have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRKW or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKW or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKW or DRAM?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.43%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between BRKW and DRAM?

BRKW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKW and 0.65% for DRAM.