PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRKW vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRKW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKW achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.29% return.


BRKW

1D
0.49%
1M
1.93%
YTD
-3.43%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
-3.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.17%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.48%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
-3.43%1.85%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
2.29%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and BUCK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRKW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKW
BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRKWBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.49

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

5.14

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

27.77

-28.33

BRKW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKW Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKW and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRKWBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-5.43%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-1.31%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

0.00%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-0.49%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

0.24%

+6.12%

Volatility

BRKW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.32%. This indicates that BRKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRKWBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

0.32%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

1.38%

+11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

2.98%

+14.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

3.46%

+13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

3.46%

+13.65%

BRKW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRKW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.30%, more than BUCK's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
25.30%14.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.39%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRKW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRKW has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to BUCK (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKW dropped -12.64% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 6.70% vs -3.54% for BRKW. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 6.70% return vs -3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.30%, compared with 7.39% for BUCK.

BRKW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKW and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRKW and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer