PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRKW vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRKW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKW achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 175.60% return.


BRKW

1D
0.49%
1M
1.93%
YTD
-3.43%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
-3.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
-0.15%
1M
12.41%
YTD
175.60%
6M
173.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
-3.43%3.03%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
175.60%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and AMDW is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

-0.17

BRKW vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRKW
AMDW

Financial Services

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

27.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BRKW
7.8%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Communication Services

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Energy

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Healthcare

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Industrials

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Real Estate

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Technology

BRKW

-

AMDW
27.8%

Utilities

BRKW

-

AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRKW vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKW
BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRKWAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

BRKW vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRKWAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-34.64%

+22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-7.34%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-14.22%

+8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

Volatility

BRKW vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRKWAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

83.24%

-66.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

83.24%

-66.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

83.24%

-66.13%

BRKW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BRKW and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

BRKW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.30%, less than AMDW's 37.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.19%34.78%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
25.30%14.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRKW and AMDW have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BRKW and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.19%, compared with 25.30% for BRKW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRKW and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer