BRKU vs. QLD
BRKU (Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BRKU is actively managed, while QLD is passively managed. Over the past year, BRKU returned -19.26% vs 85.49% for QLD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.
Performance
BRKU vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKU achieves a -14.77% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return.
BRKU
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -19.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
BRKU vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRKU Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares | -14.77% | 6.44% | -3.96% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | -7.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKU and QLD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.11 |
The correlation between BRKU and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKU vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
BRKU
QLD
BRKU vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares (BRKU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRKU | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.41 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 3.42 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 11.92 | -13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKU | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 2.70 | -3.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.60 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
BRKU vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKU drawdown since its inception was -35.37%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKU and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKU | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.37% | -83.13% | +47.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.06% | -25.13% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.11% | -0.53% | -32.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -18.17% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.14% | 7.20% | +3.94% |
Volatility
BRKU vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares (BRKU) is 7.19%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that BRKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKU | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 8.90% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.67% | 24.08% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 31.85% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 44.74% | -10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 44.56% | -10.14% |
BRKU vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKU vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
BRKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKU Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares | 2.99% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKU and QLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to BRKU (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKU dropped -35.37% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 85.49% vs -19.26% for BRKU. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BRKU has been the lower-risk option at 7.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 85.49% return vs -19.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BRKU.
BRKU has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BRKU and 0.95% for QLD.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRKU and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer