BRIE vs. IPOS
BRIE (MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BRIE is actively managed, while IPOS is passively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRIE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
BRIE vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRIE achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 32.73% return.
BRIE
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- 32.73%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- -7.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.94M | $3.85M | $4.03M | |
| $55.92K | $63.26K | $109.96K |
BRIE vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRIE MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF | 14.18% | 6.54% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 32.73% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRIE and IPOS is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRIE vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
BRIE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IPOS
BRIE vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF (BRIE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRIE vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRIE drawdown since its inception was -11.39%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIE and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -73.09% | +61.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -43.60% | +42.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -32.09% | +29.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.63% | — |
Volatility
BRIE vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 34.20% | -16.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 28.15% | -9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 24.60% | -6.40% |
BRIE vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRIE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRIE vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
BRIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than IPOS's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIE MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.35% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRIE and IPOS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRIE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRIE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
BRIE and IPOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.36%.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BRIE and 0.80% for IPOS.
Find the right allocation for BRIE and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer