BRF vs. AFK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BRF (VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF) and AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while AFK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BRF returned 3.54%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for AFK. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BRF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AFK.

Performance

BRF vs. AFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than AFK's -2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BRF has underperformed AFK with an annualized return of 3.54%, while AFK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.25% annualized return.

BRF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: -12.16%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: -0.14%
• 5Y*: -2.02%
• 10Y*: 3.54%
• ALL TIME*: 1.74%

AFK

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: -6.31%
• YTD: -2.32%
• 1Y: 26.56%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 6.08%
• 10Y*: 5.25%
• ALL TIME*: -0.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF	$3.06M	$2.15M	$2.08M
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF	$47.50K	$48.62K	$103.93K

BRF vs. AFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF	1.34%	54.17%	-35.02%	37.21%	-14.38%	-20.40%	-21.07%	40.66%	-12.07%	54.63%
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF	-2.32%	74.71%	12.10%	-12.11%	-17.31%	3.00%	4.26%	9.90%	-19.55%	28.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BRF and AFK is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2009	0.49

The correlation between BRF and AFK shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRF vs. AFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRF	AFK
Consumer Cyclical	16.3%	7.8%
Real Estate	15.1%	0.3%
Basic Materials	13.7%	34.5%
Industrials	12.6%	3.3%
Utilities	9.6%	0.2%
Financial Services	9.2%	33.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	1.9%
Healthcare	6.2%	0.6%
Energy	4.9%	6.9%
Technology	3.5%	-
Communication Services	-	11.3%

Return for Risk

BRF vs. AFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRF

BRF Risk / Return Rank: 31
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 29

AFK

AFK Risk / Return Rank: 37
AFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
AFK Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AFK Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRF vs. AFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRF	AFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	0.97	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.38	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.18	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.34	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	2.99	-0.54

BRF vs. AFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the AFK Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRF and AFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRF vs. AFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than AFK's maximum drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and AFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRF	AFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.26%	-62.46%	-19.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.51%	-19.54%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.89%	-19.54%	-17.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.02%	-37.62%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.43%	-53.33%	-7.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.60%	-14.50%	-36.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.77%	-31.88%	-13.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.97%	8.74%	+0.23%

Volatility

BRF vs. AFK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) at 5.45%. This indicates that BRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRF	AFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	5.45%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.54%	23.20%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.04%	27.08%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.50%	22.45%	+9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.82%	22.14%	+11.68%

BRF vs. AFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AFK's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRF vs. AFK - Dividend Comparison

BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than AFK's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF	1.04%	1.02%	0.00%	2.27%	3.59%	4.17%	3.91%	6.34%	1.71%	1.99%	2.67%	2.16%
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF	5.47%	5.54%	4.08%	5.02%	4.13%	2.96%	1.66%	2.54%	2.89%	4.53%	4.25%	3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRF and AFK in my portfolio?

BRF and AFK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRF or AFK?

BRF has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to AFK (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs AFK's -62.46%.

Which ETF is better, BRF or AFK?

On 10-year performance, AFK leads with 5.25% vs 3.54% for BRF. On fees, BRF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, AFK has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRF or AFK?

Over the 10-year period, AFK has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRF or AFK?

BRF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRF or AFK?

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 1.04% for AFK.

What is the main difference between BRF and AFK?

BRF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while AFK is Emerging Markets Equities. BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.78% for AFK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.