BRC vs. KEN
BRC (Brady Corporation) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. BRC operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, BRC returned 12.59%/yr vs 43.50%/yr for KEN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRC vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRC achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly lower than KEN's 28.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BRC has underperformed KEN with an annualized return of 12.59%, while KEN has yielded a comparatively higher 43.50% annualized return.
BRC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
KEN
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -9.66%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 6M
- 35.84%
- 1Y
- 135.91%
- 3Y*
- 65.33%
- 5Y*
- 35.58%
- 10Y*
- 43.50%
BRC vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 13.15% | 7.60% | 27.69% | 26.91% | -10.91% | 3.75% | -6.00% | 34.10% | 17.14% | 3.23% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 28.36% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 85.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRC and KEN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BRC and KEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BRC:
$4.21B
KEN:
$4.32B
BRC:
$4.39
KEN:
$1.54
BRC:
20.08
KEN:
52.77
BRC:
1.58
KEN:
8.86
BRC:
2.60
KEN:
4.26
BRC:
3.14
KEN:
2.88
BRC:
$1.62B
KEN:
$1.01B
BRC:
$828.93M
KEN:
$166.82M
BRC:
$300.10M
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRC vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
BRC
KEN
BRC vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brady Corporation (BRC) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.51 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 8.75 | -7.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 24.21 | -20.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 3.55 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.90 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.77 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
BRC vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRC drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, smaller than the maximum KEN drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRC and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -69.20% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.12% | -15.63% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -32.27% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | -69.20% | +39.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.21% | -69.20% | +32.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.22% | -14.80% | +6.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -23.19% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | 5.64% | +2.51% |
Volatility
BRC vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
Brady Corporation (BRC) has a higher volatility of 19.10% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) at 16.12%. This indicates that BRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.10% | 16.12% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 29.55% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 38.55% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 39.67% | -14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 41.86% | -14.22% |
Dividends
BRC vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
BRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than KEN's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.92% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.49% | 1.92% | 2.17% | 2.16% | 3.49% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 4.73% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
Financials
BRC vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brady Corporation and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BRC vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
BRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.47M and revenue of 435.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
BRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported an operating income of 73.21M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
BRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brady Corporation reported a net income of 57.80M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRC and KEN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRC has higher volatility (19.10%) compared to KEN (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRC dropped -65.62% vs KEN's -69.20%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRC and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer