BPSCX vs. BPGSX
BPSCX (Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II) and BPGSX (Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund) are both mutual funds - BPSCX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Boston Partners, while BPGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by Boston Partners. Over the past 3 years, BPSCX returned 15.92%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for BPGSX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPSCX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BPGSX.
Performance
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPSCX achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than BPGSX's 2.43% return.
BPSCX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 21.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
BPGSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 14.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPSCX Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II | 10.09% | 7.15% | 13.65% | 16.96% | -8.93% |
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 2.43% | 32.86% | 9.62% | 16.44% | -5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPSCX and BPGSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BPSCX and BPGSX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPSCX vs. BPGSX — Risk / Return Rank
BPSCX
BPGSX
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II (BPSCX) and Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BPSCX | BPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.73 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.55 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 4.23 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 18.21 | -12.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BPSCX | BPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.73 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.82 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPSCX drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than BPGSX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPSCX and BPGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPSCX | BPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.69% | -22.19% | -40.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -5.17% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.70% | -12.20% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.51% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -4.04% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.20% | +2.26% |
Volatility
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Volatility Comparison
Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II (BPSCX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BPSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPSCX | BPGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 0.00% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 5.53% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 9.38% | +6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 15.13% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 15.13% | +7.55% |
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPSCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BPGSX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPSCX vs. BPGSX - Dividend Comparison
BPSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than BPGSX's 80.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 80.06% | 16.14% | 3.04% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BPSCX Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund II | 7.33% | 8.07% | 15.19% | 13.27% | 7.76% | 7.12% | 0.32% | 2.26% | 6.95% | 4.44% | 2.09% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPSCX and BPGSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPSCX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPSCX dropped -62.69% vs BPGSX's -22.19%.
BPGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BPSCX and BPGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer