BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO
BPRF.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF) and KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPRF.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton, while KNGG.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BPRF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 2.30% |
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 6.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPRF.TO and KNGG.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BPRF.TO
KNGG.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) and Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPRF.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPRF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, which is greater than KNGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPRF.TO and KNGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPRF.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.50% | -3.33% | -32.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -1.48% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -1.29% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPRF.TO | KNGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.57% | 14.89% | -9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 14.89% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 14.89% | -1.15% |
Dividends
BPRF.TO vs. KNGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
BPRF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than KNGG.TO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 5.91% | 5.78% | 5.72% | 6.02% | 5.71% | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.27% |
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPRF.TO and KNGG.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPRF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while KNGG.TO is Global Equities.
Find the right allocation for BPRF.TO and KNGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer