KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KNGG.TO

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VVL.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 2.72%
• 6M: 11.18%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 1Y: 30.97%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	6.22%
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and VVL.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGG.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VVL.TO

VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KNGG.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.89	—

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and VVL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNGG.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-43.88%	+40.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.39%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-5.73%	+4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KNGG.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.89%	13.87%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	16.08%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	18.77%	-3.88%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VVL.TO's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	1.62%	1.89%	2.19%	2.69%	2.57%	1.50%	1.70%	2.65%	2.15%	1.35%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNGG.TO and VVL.TO in my portfolio?

KNGG.TO and VVL.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between KNGG.TO and VVL.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Vanguard.