KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO
KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and BGIE.TO (Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Brompton. Both are actively managed. At 0.10, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIE.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 12.93%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 45.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.44% |
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGG.TO and BGIE.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGG.TO
BGIE.TO
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGG.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.99 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum BGIE.TO drawdown of -18.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and BGIE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGG.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -18.24% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -2.37% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -4.51% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.31% | — |
Volatility
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGG.TO | BGIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 14.81% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 15.64% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 15.26% | -5.41% |
Dividends
KNGG.TO vs. BGIE.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.71% | 4.95% | 4.89% | 5.19% | 4.79% | 4.10% | 3.07% |