KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO
KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and FGEP.TO (Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
KNGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGEP.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | 0.44% |
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGG.TO and FGEP.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGG.TO
FGEP.TO
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGG.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.50 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum FGEP.TO drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and FGEP.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGG.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -14.78% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.57% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -1.73% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.70% | — |
Volatility
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGG.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 10.68% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 12.78% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 12.78% | -2.93% |
Dividends
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither KNGG.TO nor FGEP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.