PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period


KNGG.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGEP.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
4.82%
YTD
7.73%
6M
11.62%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and FGEP.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGG.TO

FGEP.TO
FGEP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FGEP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGEP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGEP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGEP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGEP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGG.TOFGEP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

1.50

+0.12

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum FGEP.TO drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and FGEP.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGG.TOFGEP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-14.78%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.57%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-1.73%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

Volatility

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KNGG.TOFGEP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

10.68%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

12.78%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.85%

12.78%

-2.93%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNGG.TO nor FGEP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments