BPH vs. MARU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian, while MARU is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Price Return. BPH is actively managed, while MARU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MARU.

Performance

BPH vs. MARU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MARU

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. MARU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and MARU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.03

Return for Risk

BPH vs. MARU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 61
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. MARU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPH	MARU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.48	1.43	+8.05

Drawdowns

BPH vs. MARU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum MARU drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and MARU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	MARU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-8.50%	+6.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.52%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-1.34%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	MARU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	9.81%	+15.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	11.78%	+13.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.75%	11.78%	+13.97%

BPH vs. MARU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MARU's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPH vs. MARU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BPH nor MARU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and MARU in my portfolio?

BPH and MARU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or MARU?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or MARU?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MARU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or MARU?

BPH and MARU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BPH and MARU?

BPH is categorized as Oil & Gas, while MARU is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and AllianzIM. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.74% for MARU.