BPGSX vs. MGGPX
BPGSX (Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund) and MGGPX (Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BPGSX returned 17.07%/yr vs 15.41%/yr for MGGPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPGSX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MGGPX.
Performance
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than MGGPX's 5.86% return.
BPGSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 14.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- -4.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 2.43% | 32.86% | 9.62% | 16.44% | -5.69% |
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 5.86% | 0.77% | 27.16% | 49.29% | -31.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPGSX and MGGPX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BPGSX and MGGPX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPGSX vs. MGGPX — Risk / Return Rank
BPGSX
MGGPX
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPGSX | MGGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | -0.13 | +3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | -0.27 | +13.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum MGGPX drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and MGGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPGSX | MGGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -51.83% | +29.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -28.32% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.20% | -28.32% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -10.62% | +10.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -9.46% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 13.22% | -12.01% |
Volatility
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPGSX | MGGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 9.94% | -9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 17.69% | -12.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.11% | 23.70% | -14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 26.39% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 23.26% | -8.22% |
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MGGPX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Dividend Comparison
BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, while MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund | 80.06% | 16.14% | 3.04% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.95% | 2.27% | 24.31% | 5.14% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.40% | 7.23% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPGSX and MGGPX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGGPX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGSX dropped -22.19% vs MGGPX's -51.83%.
BPGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BPGSX and MGGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer