PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPGSX vs. MGGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than MGGPX's 5.86% return.


BPGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.43%
6M
1.72%
1Y
14.15%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
10Y*

MGGPX

1D
-1.11%
1M
6.18%
YTD
5.86%
6M
5.51%
1Y
-4.88%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
2.43%32.86%9.62%16.44%-5.69%
MGGPX
Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A
5.86%0.77%27.16%49.29%-31.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and MGGPX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between BPGSX and MGGPX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. MGGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX
BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MGGPX
MGGPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MGGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MGGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPGSXMGGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.99

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

-0.13

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

-0.27

+13.15

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the MGGPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and MGGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum MGGPX drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and MGGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPGSXMGGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-51.83%

+29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-28.32%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

-28.32%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-10.62%

+10.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-9.46%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

13.22%

-12.01%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPGSXMGGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

9.94%

-9.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

17.69%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

23.70%

-14.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

26.39%

-11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

23.26%

-8.22%

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MGGPX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPGSX vs. MGGPX - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, while MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPGSX
Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund
80.06%16.14%3.04%1.52%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGGPX
Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%9.95%2.27%24.31%5.14%1.20%0.00%0.82%0.40%7.23%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPGSX and MGGPX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGGPX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to BPGSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGSX dropped -22.19% vs MGGPX's -51.83%.

BPGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPGSX and MGGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer