BPAY vs. IAT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. BPAY is actively managed, while IAT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 9.60%/yr vs 27.94%/yr for IAT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IAT.

Performance

BPAY vs. IAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than IAT's 14.33% return.

BPAY

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 6M: -11.58%
• 1Y: -17.22%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAT

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 8.56%
• YTD: 14.33%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 32.81%
• 3Y*: 27.94%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. IAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-9.13%	8.54%	17.28%	13.19%	-16.32%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	14.33%	13.05%	24.36%	-8.53%	-13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and IAT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between BPAY and IAT has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BPAY vs. IAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BPAY	IAT
Financial Services	58.0%	100.0%
Technology	30.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	-
Industrials	5.1%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BPAY vs. IAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IAT

IAT Risk / Return Rank: 44
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPAY	IAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	1.50	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	2.05	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.27	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	1.88	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	4.79	-5.75

BPAY vs. IAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the IAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and IAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and IAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPAY	IAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-77.22%	+43.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.62%	-17.49%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.62%	-29.29%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.23%	0.00%	-23.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-26.90%	+16.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.01%	6.87%	+11.14%

Volatility

BPAY vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) at 6.92%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPAY	IAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.69%	6.92%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	16.20%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.85%	21.98%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.47%	28.95%	-4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.47%	30.73%	-6.26%

BPAY vs. IAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IAT's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPAY vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than IAT's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	7.46%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	2.59%	2.94%	2.95%	3.56%	3.12%	1.88%	2.87%	2.49%	2.48%	1.55%	1.52%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPAY and IAT in my portfolio?

BPAY and IAT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPAY or IAT?

BPAY has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to IAT (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs IAT's -77.22%.

Which ETF is better, BPAY or IAT?

On 3-year performance, IAT leads with 27.94% vs 9.60% for BPAY. On fees, IAT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BPAY or IAT?

Over the 3-year period, IAT has performed better with a 27.94% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPAY or IAT?

IAT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPAY or IAT?

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 2.59% for IAT.

What is the main difference between BPAY and IAT?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.42% for IAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.