BPAY vs. FLR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while FLR (Fluor Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 9.98%/yr vs 17.47%/yr for FLR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

BPAY vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than FLR's 24.93% return.

BPAY

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 7.86%
• 6M: -0.87%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 1Y: -13.26%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLR

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -2.25%
• 6M: 13.97%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 1Y: -7.49%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 26.44%
• 10Y*: 0.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-0.95%	8.54%	17.28%	13.19%	-16.32%
FLR Fluor Corporation	24.93%	-19.65%	25.91%	13.01%	26.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and FLR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.53

The correlation between BPAY and FLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BPAY vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FLR

FLR Risk / Return Rank: 37
FLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FLR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FLR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPAY	FLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	-0.15	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	0.16	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.02	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	-0.25	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	-0.38	-0.34

BPAY vs. FLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and FLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and FLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPAY	FLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-95.89%	+62.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.62%	-30.19%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.62%	-47.63%	+14.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.32%	-40.10%	+23.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-41.60%	+30.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.48%	19.73%	-1.25%

Volatility

BPAY vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 6.81%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPAY	FLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	11.42%	-4.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	34.94%	-14.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.15%	51.85%	-25.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	45.07%	-20.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.49%	57.70%	-33.21%

Dividends

BPAY vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	6.84%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLR Fluor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.63%	3.87%	2.61%	1.63%	1.60%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPAY and FLR in my portfolio?

BPAY and FLR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPAY or FLR?

FLR has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to BPAY (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs FLR's -95.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.