PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAY vs. BLCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BPAY vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BPAY vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-18.58%8.54%17.28%16.42%
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
-2.92%19.96%12.63%15.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -18.58% return, which is significantly lower than BLCV's -2.92% return.


BPAY

1D
3.03%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
-18.58%
6M
-26.92%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
10Y*

BLCV

1D
2.34%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
1.43%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BPAY vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BPAY vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCV
BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPAYBLCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

0.83

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.03

1.23

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.22

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.30

4.76

-5.06

BPAY vs. BLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the BLCV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and BLCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPAYBLCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

0.83

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

1.24

-1.26

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and BLCV is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BPAY vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than BLCV's 1.40% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.97%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.37%1.63%1.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than BLCV's maximum drawdown of -13.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and BLCV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAYBLCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-13.44%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-11.18%

-22.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.22%

-7.81%

-23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-2.06%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.63%

2.87%

+10.76%

Volatility

BPAY vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) at 4.74%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BPAYBLCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

4.74%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.05%

8.73%

+10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.28%

15.51%

+13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.20%

12.81%

+11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

12.81%

+11.39%