PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 18.64% return.


BOTZ

1D
3.04%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
5.58%
6M
6.30%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
1.58%
1M
7.41%
YTD
18.64%
6M
17.69%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
5.58%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
18.64%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and SPHQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.74

The correlation between BOTZ and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
SPHQ

Industrials

49.3%
20.7%

Technology

31.8%
33.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
4.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.9%
12.6%

Energy

0.5%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
14.7%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.0%

Utilities

0.0%
3.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

BOTZ
49.3%
SPHQ
20.7%

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
SPHQ
33.1%

Healthcare

BOTZ
8.0%
SPHQ
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.4%
SPHQ
4.4%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.4%
SPHQ
0.4%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
SPHQ
12.6%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
SPHQ
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
SPHQ
14.7%

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
SPHQ
2.0%

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
SPHQ
3.4%

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.22

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

13.80

-9.59

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-57.83%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-8.90%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-16.57%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-25.04%

-30.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

0.00%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-10.68%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

2.07%

+3.79%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.05%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

5.05%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.72%

10.88%

+8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

13.16%

+12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

16.55%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

17.91%

+7.90%

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than SPHQ's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.62%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.01%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to SPHQ (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.06% vs 2.06% for BOTZ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer