PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. SDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SDIV's 5.97% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*

SDIV

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
5.97%
6M
6.19%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
-0.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
5.97%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and SDIV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.58

The correlation between BOTZ and SDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
SDIV

Industrials

48.6%
14.3%

Technology

31.8%
1.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.5%
6.1%

Financial Services

0.9%
8.9%

Energy

0.5%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.8%

Utilities

0.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

36.2%

Industrials

BOTZ
48.6%
SDIV
14.3%

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
SDIV
1.6%

Healthcare

BOTZ
9.0%
SDIV
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.1%
SDIV
5.5%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.5%
SDIV
6.1%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
SDIV
8.9%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
SDIV
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
SDIV
3.7%

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
SDIV
2.8%

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
SDIV
1.1%

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

SDIV
36.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTZSDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.43

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

12.41

-7.14

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and SDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTZSDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.02

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.06

+0.38

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and SDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZSDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-56.90%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-7.35%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-18.64%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-41.94%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-17.77%

+14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-18.59%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

2.03%

+3.60%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) at 4.21%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZSDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

4.21%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

9.64%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

12.47%

+11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

16.86%

+9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

18.97%

+6.76%

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than SDIV's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
10.02%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and SDIV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to SDIV (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs SDIV's -56.90%.

On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 3.18% vs -0.84% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 3.18% return vs -0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while SDIV is Global Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and SDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer