BOTZ vs. RBIL
BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOTZ returned 20.00% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 10.47% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.32% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTZ and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTZ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
BOTZ
RBIL
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 2.13 | -0.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 7.82 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 42.95 | -39.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -0.52% | -55.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -0.52% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.99% | -0.50% | -11.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -0.07% | -18.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 0.10% | +5.91% |
Volatility
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 0.36% | +9.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 0.85% | +19.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 0.95% | +24.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 1.07% | +25.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 1.07% | +24.76% |
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOTZ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOTZ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, BOTZ leads with 20.00% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 20.00% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.
BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOTZ and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer