PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. KOMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than KOMP's 23.59% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*

KOMP

1D
-2.06%
1M
11.27%
YTD
23.59%
6M
21.48%
1Y
46.75%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-14.74%
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
23.59%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and KOMP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.83

The correlation between BOTZ and KOMP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
KOMP

Industrials

48.6%
28.2%

Technology

31.8%
33.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.5%
5.6%

Financial Services

0.9%
5.8%

Energy

0.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.9%

Utilities

0.0%
5.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

BOTZ
48.6%
KOMP
28.2%

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
KOMP
33.0%

Healthcare

BOTZ
9.0%
KOMP
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.1%
KOMP
4.7%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.5%
KOMP
5.6%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
KOMP
5.8%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
KOMP
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
KOMP
0.2%

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
KOMP
2.9%

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
KOMP
5.2%

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

KOMP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. KOMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTZKOMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.03

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

9.86

-4.60

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the KOMP Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and KOMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTZKOMPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.03

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.14

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than KOMP's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and KOMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZKOMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-50.06%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-15.50%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-24.93%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-45.38%

-10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-2.06%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-21.69%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

4.75%

+0.88%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) have volatilities of 7.77% and 7.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZKOMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

7.43%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

17.95%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

23.15%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

24.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

27.02%

-1.29%

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than KOMP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. KOMP - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than KOMP's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.43%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and KOMP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to KOMP (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs KOMP's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, KOMP leads with 3.36% vs 3.18% for BOTZ. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KOMP has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 3.36% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while KOMP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.20% for KOMP.

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and KOMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer