PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. CHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 63.02% return.


BOTZ

1D
2.02%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.50%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%

CHPX

1D
1.58%
1M
-7.25%
6M
46.32%
YTD
63.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.33M$29.66M$37.04M
$4.58M$5.12M$10.03M

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and CHPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZCHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and CHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZCHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-27.10%

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.65%

-19.67%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-5.37%

-12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZCHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

44.88%

-18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.29%

44.88%

-17.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

44.88%

-18.99%

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than CHPX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
0.04%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and CHPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.

BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.50% for CHPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and CHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer