PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTT vs. NXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOTT vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOTT vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
10.26%55.56%10.74%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
5.29%28.46%16.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than NXTG's 5.29% return.


BOTT

1D
2.27%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
10.26%
6M
16.43%
1Y
83.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NXTG

1D
1.18%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
5.29%
6M
9.14%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOTT vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOTT vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT
BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTTNXTGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.78

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.47

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.87

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.46

12.13

-2.67

BOTT vs. NXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the NXTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and NXTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTTNXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.78

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.55

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and NXTG is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BOTT vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than NXTG's 1.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
0.12%0.14%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.62%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and NXTG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTTNXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.74%

-33.61%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.74%

-12.49%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.20%

-6.09%

-20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-7.95%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.84%

2.95%

+5.89%

Volatility

BOTT vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) at 7.61%. This indicates that BOTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOTTNXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

7.61%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.52%

13.28%

+17.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.67%

19.90%

+17.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.68%

17.42%

+15.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

18.64%

+14.04%