BOTT vs. COPA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and COPA (Themes Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTT is a Robotics fund tracking the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while COPA is a Copper fund tracking the BITA Global Copper Mining Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOTT returned 68.82% vs 99.76% for COPA. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

BOTT vs. COPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than COPA's 13.98% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -11.51%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 19.49%
• 1Y: 68.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COPA

• 1D: -6.61%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 99.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. COPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	14.95%	55.56%	2.37%
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	13.98%	100.86%	-13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and COPA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.50

The correlation between BOTT and COPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. COPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 48
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

COPA

COPA Risk / Return Rank: 72
COPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
COPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
COPA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
COPA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. COPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	COPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.41	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.75	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.58	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	11.60	-5.96

BOTT vs. COPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the COPA Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and COPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. COPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum COPA drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and COPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	COPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-34.72%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-28.05%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.07%	-11.77%	-11.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-9.54%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.25%	8.63%	+3.62%

Volatility

BOTT vs. COPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) is 12.52%, while Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) has a volatility of 17.52%. This indicates that BOTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	COPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	17.52%	-5.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.19%	36.16%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	41.67%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.68%	39.27%	-5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.68%	39.27%	-5.59%

BOTT vs. COPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTT and COPA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

BOTT vs. COPA - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than COPA's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	3.74%	4.26%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and COPA in my portfolio?

BOTT and COPA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOTT or COPA?

COPA has higher volatility (17.52%) compared to BOTT (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTT dropped -30.74% vs COPA's -34.72%.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or COPA?

On 1-year performance, COPA leads with 99.76% vs 68.82% for BOTT. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, BOTT has been the lower-risk option at 12.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOTT or COPA?

Over the 1-year period, COPA has performed better with a 99.76% return vs 68.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or COPA?

BOTT and COPA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or COPA?

COPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.12% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between BOTT and COPA?

BOTT is categorized as Robotics, while COPA is Copper. BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while COPA tracks BITA Global Copper Mining Select Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.