BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both Robotics funds - BOTG.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index while RBOD.L tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOTG.L returned 5.73%/yr vs 16.91%/yr for RBOD.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RBOD.L.

Performance

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while RBOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RBOD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than RBOD.L's 24.03% return.

BOTG.L

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -6.20%
• 6M: -5.88%
• YTD: -2.23%
• 1Y: 9.83%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBOD.L

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -6.47%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 24.03%
• 1Y: 31.69%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-2.23%	5.46%	15.00%	32.59%	-36.01%	-30.00%
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	24.03%	8.71%	7.78%	32.69%	-26.76%	-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and RBOD.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.83

The correlation between BOTG.L and RBOD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTG.L	RBOD.L
Industrials	48.1%	25.5%
Technology	41.2%	71.1%
Healthcare	9.0%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.3%	0.1%
Financial Services	1.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	0.1%
Energy	0.5%	-
Communication Services	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RBOD.L

RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTG.L	RBOD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.27	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	1.89	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.23	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	2.32	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	6.51	-5.15

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and RBOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -57.90%, which is greater than RBOD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and RBOD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTG.L	RBOD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.90%	-33.68%	-24.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.52%	-13.57%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.92%	-27.60%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.57%	-9.33%	-20.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.19%	-9.13%	-30.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.22%	4.86%	+2.36%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) is 9.47%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that BOTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTG.L	RBOD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	10.24%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.90%	21.02%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.56%	24.79%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.84%	22.78%	+7.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.84%	22.57%	+7.27%

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBOD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTG.L vs. RBOD.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than RBOD.L's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.33%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	0.31%	0.34%	0.36%	0.45%	0.56%	0.32%	0.34%	0.79%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTG.L and RBOD.L in my portfolio?

BOTG.L and RBOD.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTG.L or RBOD.L?

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTG.L or RBOD.L?

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTG.L.

What is the main difference between BOTG.L and RBOD.L?

BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTG.L and 0.40% for RBOD.L.