PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOOT vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 36.37%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively lower 25.76% annualized return.


BOOT

1D
-2.50%
1M
16.57%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-16.66%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
29.89%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
36.37%

GOOGL

1D
0.53%
1M
-10.27%
YTD
15.06%
6M
16.44%
1Y
106.51%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
24.46%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
-3.32%16.24%97.79%22.78%-49.19%183.79%-2.63%161.48%2.53%32.67%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
15.06%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and GOOGL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.26

The correlation between BOOT and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BOOT:

$5.24B

GOOGL:

$4.40T

EPS

BOOT:

$7.35

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

BOOT:

23.21

GOOGL:

27.43

PEG Ratio

BOOT:

4.75

GOOGL:

1.35

PS Ratio

BOOT:

2.33

GOOGL:

10.40

PB Ratio

BOOT:

3.97

GOOGL:

9.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOOT:

$2.25B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOOT:

$858.36M

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOOT:

$358.43M

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOOT vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOT
BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOOTGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.59

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

5.20

-5.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

18.48

-18.15

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOOTGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.73%

-65.29%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.01%

-20.37%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.93%

-29.81%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.62%

-44.32%

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.88%

-44.32%

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.97%

-10.61%

-7.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-13.01%

-19.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.87%

5.72%

+8.15%

Volatility

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 7.24%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOOTGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.54%

7.24%

+7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

20.82%

+12.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.52%

29.31%

+14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.90%

31.33%

+18.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.02%

29.13%

+27.89%

Dividends

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM20252024
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%

Financials

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
538.75M
109.90B
(BOOT) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BOOT vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
36.3%
62.5%
Portfolio components
BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOOT and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOOT has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to GOOGL (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOOT and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer