PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BOIL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BOIL vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - BOIL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BOIL returned -56.95%/yr vs 45.33%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOIL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -56.95%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.

BOIL

1D
4.32%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-62.98%
1Y
-74.31%
3Y*
-60.61%
5Y*
-64.63%
10Y*
-56.95%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas		-36.77%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-67.70%-20.55%-65.72%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ		64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and TQQQ is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011

0.02

The correlation between BOIL and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

Often compared with BOIL:
BOIL vs. KOLDBOIL vs. UNGBOIL vs. UCOBOIL vs. UNLBOIL vs. LNGBOIL vs. SCOBOIL vs. BNO
Often compared with TQQQ:
TQQQ vs. QQQTQQQ vs. SOXLTQQQ vs. QLDTQQQ vs. SQQQTQQQ vs. SPXLTQQQ vs. UPROTQQQ vs. TECL

Return for Risk

BOIL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BOILTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.66
2.92

-3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.78
3.09

-3.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.40

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.75

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

12.27

-13.52

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BOILTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

2.92

-3.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

0.43

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

0.69

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.74

-1.35

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and TQQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BOILTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-81.66%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.85%

-36.97%

-43.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.86%

-58.04%

-38.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

-81.66%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-81.66%

-18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-0.76%

-99.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.59%

-18.52%

-75.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.20%

11.28%

+47.92%

Volatility

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 23.95% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BOILTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.95%

13.29%

+10.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.61%

36.04%

+71.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.64%

47.60%

+66.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.89%

66.53%

+52.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.81%

65.96%

+35.85%

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOIL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ		0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

BOIL and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -56.95% for BOIL. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -56.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.

BOIL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer