BOIL vs. SPY
BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOIL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BOIL returned -56.95%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOIL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
BOIL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -56.95%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
BOIL
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- -36.77%
- 6M
- -62.98%
- 1Y
- -74.31%
- 3Y*
- -60.61%
- 5Y*
- -64.63%
- 10Y*
- -56.95%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
BOIL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -36.77% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -67.70% | -20.55% | -65.72% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOIL and SPY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011 | 0.03 |
The correlation between BOIL and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOIL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
BOIL
SPY
BOIL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOIL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.43 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 3.16 | -4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 14.72 | -15.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOIL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.38 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.55 | 0.82 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 | 0.87 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.59 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
BOIL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOIL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -55.19% | -44.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.85% | -8.88% | -71.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.86% | -18.76% | -78.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.91% | -24.50% | -75.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -33.72% | -66.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -0.70% | -99.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -9.05% | -84.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.20% | 1.91% | +57.29% |
Volatility
BOIL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 23.95% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOIL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.95% | 2.84% | +21.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.61% | 8.90% | +98.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.64% | 11.83% | +101.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.89% | 17.05% | +101.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.81% | 17.94% | +83.87% |
BOIL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOIL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOIL and SPY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOIL has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs -56.95% for BOIL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs -56.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.
BOIL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SPY is S&P 500. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOIL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer