PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. NRGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOIL vs. NRGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly higher than NRGD's -70.71% return.


BOIL

1D
4.32%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-62.98%
1Y
-74.31%
3Y*
-60.61%
5Y*
-64.63%
10Y*
-56.95%

NRGD

1D
-5.59%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
-70.71%
6M
-67.28%
1Y
-80.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOIL vs. NRGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and NRGD is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOIL vs. NRGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGD
NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOIL vs. NRGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOILNRGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.74

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.98

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

-1.53

+0.27

BOIL vs. NRGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is higher than the NRGD Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and NRGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOILNRGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-1.09

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

-0.81

+0.20

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. NRGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NRGD's maximum drawdown of -89.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and NRGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOILNRGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-89.64%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.85%

-82.88%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-89.24%

-10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.59%

-58.88%

-34.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.20%

52.87%

+6.33%

Volatility

BOIL vs. NRGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) is 23.95%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a volatility of 29.27%. This indicates that BOIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOILNRGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.95%

29.27%

-5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.61%

58.52%

+49.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.64%

74.26%

+39.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.89%

88.83%

+30.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.81%

88.83%

+12.98%

BOIL vs. NRGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOIL vs. NRGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOIL nor NRGD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BOIL and NRGD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGD has higher volatility (29.27%) compared to BOIL (23.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs NRGD's -89.64%.

On 1-year performance, BOIL leads with -74.31% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, NRGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BOIL has been the lower-risk option at 23.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOIL has performed better with a -74.31% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

BOIL and NRGD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOIL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while NRGD is Leveraged Equities. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.95% for NRGD.

BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and NRGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer