PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. DRIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOIL vs. DRIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BOIL having a -41.05% return and DRIP slightly lower at -41.20%. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed DRIP with an annualized return of -57.84%, while DRIP has yielded a comparatively higher -42.06% annualized return.


BOIL

1D
-4.80%
1M
5.97%
YTD
-41.05%
6M
-46.24%
1Y
-75.60%
3Y*
-66.48%
5Y*
-66.38%
10Y*
-57.84%

DRIP

1D
-0.94%
1M
18.92%
YTD
-41.20%
6M
-40.68%
1Y
-42.23%
3Y*
-27.26%
5Y*
-38.71%
10Y*
-42.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOIL vs. DRIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-41.05%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-67.70%-20.55%-65.72%
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-41.20%-14.81%1.27%-17.24%-73.57%-79.74%-42.76%-36.11%49.62%-9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and DRIP is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOIL vs. DRIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOIL vs. DRIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOILDRIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.90

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.68

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.25

-0.10

BOIL vs. DRIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the DRIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and DRIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. DRIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIP drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and DRIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOILDRIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.43%

-62.18%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.86%

-76.02%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

-96.24%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-99.92%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-99.93%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.59%

-90.46%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.83%

33.75%

+23.08%

Volatility

BOIL vs. DRIP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 23.63% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) at 18.04%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOILDRIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.63%

18.04%

+5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.46%

43.68%

+60.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.44%

56.75%

+56.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.97%

68.37%

+50.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.84%

96.33%

+5.51%

BOIL vs. DRIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIP's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOIL vs. DRIP - Dividend Comparison

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.36%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOIL and DRIP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (23.63%) compared to DRIP (18.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs DRIP's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, DRIP leads with -42.06% vs -57.84% for BOIL. On fees, DRIP is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, DRIP has been the lower-risk option at 18.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DRIP has performed better with a -42.06% return vs -57.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIP is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.

BOIL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while DRIP is Leveraged Equities. BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 1.07% for DRIP.

BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and DRIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer