BOIL vs. BITO
BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOIL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. BOIL is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOIL returned -66.02%/yr vs 16.49%/yr for BITO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BOIL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
BOIL vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -38.60% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -32.58% return.
BOIL
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- -38.60%
- 6M
- -41.10%
- 1Y
- -72.68%
- 3Y*
- -66.02%
- 5Y*
- -66.45%
- 10Y*
- -57.67%
BITO
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -21.14%
- YTD
- -32.58%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- -45.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOIL vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -38.60% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | -57.29% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -32.58% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOIL and BITO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BOIL and BITO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOIL vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
BOIL
BITO
BOIL vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOIL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.83 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.85 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.45 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOIL vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOIL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -77.86% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.43% | -53.50% | -23.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.86% | -53.50% | -43.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -53.50% | -46.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -36.87% | -56.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.95% | 31.47% | +24.48% |
Volatility
BOIL vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 22.78% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 13.03%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOIL | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.78% | 13.03% | +9.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.55% | 34.32% | +70.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.22% | 44.22% | +69.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.95% | 55.03% | +63.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.83% | 55.03% | +46.80% |
BOIL vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOIL vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 73.86% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOIL and BITO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOIL has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to BITO (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 16.49% vs -66.02% for BOIL. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 13.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 16.49% return vs -66.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 73.86%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.
BOIL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BOIL and 0.95% for BITO.
BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOIL and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer