BOIL vs. AESI
BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, while AESI (Atlas Energy Solutions Inc) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BOIL returned -60.61%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for AESI. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOIL vs. AESI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than AESI's 90.13% return.
BOIL
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- -36.77%
- 6M
- -62.98%
- 1Y
- -74.31%
- 3Y*
- -60.61%
- 5Y*
- -64.63%
- 10Y*
- -56.95%
AESI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 90.13%
- 6M
- 84.64%
- 1Y
- 41.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOIL vs. AESI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -36.77% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -73.76% |
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 90.13% | -55.28% | 34.96% | 5.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOIL and AESI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOIL vs. AESI — Risk / Return Rank
BOIL
AESI
BOIL vs. AESI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOIL | AESI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.16 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 0.95 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 1.98 | -3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOIL | AESI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.70 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.13 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
BOIL vs. AESI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than AESI's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and AESI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOIL | AESI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -65.91% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.85% | -43.54% | -37.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.86% | -65.91% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -24.63% | -75.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -25.28% | -68.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.20% | 20.81% | +38.39% |
Volatility
BOIL vs. AESI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 23.95% compared to Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) at 16.46%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AESI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOIL | AESI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.95% | 16.46% | +7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.61% | 40.31% | +67.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.64% | 59.02% | +54.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.89% | 48.35% | +70.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.81% | 48.35% | +53.46% |
Dividends
BOIL vs. AESI - Dividend Comparison
BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AESI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 1.40% | 7.96% | 4.33% | 4.07% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOIL and AESI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOIL has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to AESI (16.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs AESI's -65.91%.
AESI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOIL and AESI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer