PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. ^XNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -51.97% return, which is significantly lower than ^XNG's 19.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed ^XNG with an annualized return of -58.64%, while ^XNG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.


BOIL

1D
-2.65%
1M
-22.34%
6M
-31.80%
YTD
-51.97%
1Y
-77.53%
3Y*
-66.23%
5Y*
-68.58%
10Y*
-58.64%

^XNG

1D
1.07%
1M
2.93%
6M
18.94%
YTD
19.46%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-51.97%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-67.70%-20.55%-65.72%
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
19.46%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and ^XNG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOIL vs. ^XNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOIL^XNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.24

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

1.95

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

4.86

-6.25

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the ^XNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and ^XNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ^XNG's maximum drawdown of -84.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and ^XNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOIL^XNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-84.52%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.83%

-11.79%

-66.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.17%

-14.10%

-83.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.92%

-25.27%

-74.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-77.64%

-22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-12.79%

-87.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.61%

-27.24%

-66.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.55%

4.73%

+50.82%

Volatility

BOIL vs. ^XNG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 19.67% compared to NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) at 5.07%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOIL^XNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.67%

5.07%

+14.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.26%

12.83%

+87.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.81%

16.21%

+95.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.02%

21.65%

+97.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.73%

28.70%

+73.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOIL and ^XNG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (19.67%) compared to ^XNG (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOIL dropped -100.00% vs ^XNG's -84.52%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOIL and ^XNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer