PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XNG vs. KOLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XNG vs. KOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XNG achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than KOLD's -37.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XNG has outperformed KOLD with an annualized return of 3.95%, while KOLD has yielded a comparatively lower -25.09% annualized return.


^XNG

1D
1.31%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
16.30%
6M
17.53%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
3.95%

KOLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
-14.27%
YTD
-37.17%
6M
-42.50%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
-6.55%
5Y*
-38.86%
10Y*
-25.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XNG vs. KOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
16.30%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%
KOLD
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas
-37.17%-17.48%-11.34%249.82%-88.62%-74.44%22.05%82.94%-46.48%72.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XNG and KOLD is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XNG vs. KOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KOLD
KOLD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
KOLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
KOLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XNG vs. KOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^XNGKOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.12

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

0.24

+3.78

^XNG vs. KOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the KOLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XNG and KOLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^XNG vs. KOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XNG drawdown since its inception was -84.52%, smaller than the maximum KOLD drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XNG and KOLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XNGKOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.52%

-99.45%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-72.50%

+60.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-84.34%

+70.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-98.07%

+72.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.64%

-99.45%

+21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.09%

-97.43%

+82.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-69.56%

+42.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

37.81%

-33.70%

Volatility

^XNG vs. KOLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) is 5.27%, while ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) has a volatility of 23.90%. This indicates that ^XNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XNGKOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

23.90%

-18.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

96.77%

-84.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

113.49%

-97.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.72%

118.83%

-97.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

101.81%

-73.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


^XNG and KOLD have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOLD has higher volatility (23.90%) compared to ^XNG (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XNG dropped -84.52% vs KOLD's -99.45%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XNG and KOLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer